|
Johnsongrass (Sorghum
halepense (L.) Pers.) Control in Corn.
J.E. Rowehl
and W.S. Curran, 1993. Proc. NEWSS 47:34.
Johnsongrass
(Sorghum halepense) is considered one of the major weed
control challenges in corn in southern Pennsylvania. Nicosulfuron
(Accent) and primisulfuron (Beacon) are two recently introduced
post-emergence herbicide products available to control this weed.
To learn more how these products perform under various conditions,
two different field trials were conducted in 1991 and 1992 in
York County, PA. These studies were intended to indicate what
a farmer might expect to happen if a) the products are applied
at different weed growth stages , b) split applications were used,
c) lower than standard rates were used, or d) a combination of
the products were used.
Treatments
in 1991 compared the effects of using half versus the full label
rate of product at both the recommended stage of weed growth (8-18")
and at a later application (18-30") time, as well as the full
rate split between both times. Crop oil concentrate was included
in each treatment. The trial was done in a cooperating farmer's
field that was chisel plowed and disked. In 1992 the same field
was used however the planting was done with no tillage. Application
of the full rate of each product was compared to two thirds the
rate as well as a combined half rate of each product, all applied
at the recommended weed growth stage (6-15"). Crop oil concentrate
and UAN solution were included in each treatment.
Growing conditions
in 1991 were poor. There was negligible rain after May 10 with
above normal temperatures. Plants were under stress before, during,
and after application. Results show that the performance of nicosulfuron
and primisulfuron did not differ significantly when averaged over
rates and timings, although ratings of nicosulfuron were generally
higher, particularly later in the season. Application rate was
more important with nicosulfuron than primisulfuron. Applications
at the recommended growth stage gave better control than later
applications at both rates. The split application of nicosulfuron
gave the best control although the full rate at the first application
was nearly as good.
In 1992 rainfall
was below average but adequate. Temperature was below normal.
Growth of the Johnsongrass from rhizomes was well ahead of the
corn. Early season (28 days post application) control ratings
showed no differences in control between all treatments. Later
season ratings (54 days post application) showed the percent control
provided by nicosulfuron was maintained and was significantly
better than primisulfuron at all rates. Reduced rates provided
comparable control to the full rates. Combining half rates of
both products provided the greatest control but not significantly
higher than nicosulfuron alone. Overall, control was better in
1992 than 1991.
Based on the
results of these studies, application rates should not be reduced
when growing conditions are hot and dry, particularly when applied
beyond optimum growth stage. Reducing rates to two thirds may
provide control comparable to the full rate when applied at the
optimum time and under good growing conditions. Split applications
provide slightly better control but probably not enough to justify
a second trip across the field.
eason control
in one of two years, but did not impact late season control of
hemp dogbane. Spring chisel plowing increased hemp dogbane biomass
in the absence of an effective herbicide in one of two years.
Spring chisel plowing also reduced glyphosate performance in one
year and primisulfuron plus dicamba performance in another. Spring
chisel plowing plus primisulfuron and dicamba was the least effective
treatment in one of two years, providing only 50% control. Glyphosate
was more consistent than the early summer application across years
and appeared to provide better control of perennial vegetative
structures. The combination of fall glyphosate followed by primisulfuron
plus dicamba in corn always provided greater than 90% control
regardless of tillage system.
|